Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Cost and Complications
History of Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopy
25 years ago now
appeared the surgery colorectal laparoscopy. She was controversial and fought.
He had to demonstrates, by of name-pre-uses studies, his interest and his
profits for the patients and the system of health before to validates through
administrative authorities and learned societies.
Use of Simulation for
Laparoscopy Training with Lap Trainer Box is Significant.
When, about ten
years ago, an electronic tele-manipulator (which some have called a
“robot") was introduced, it immediately aroused the enthusiasm of
surgeons. These are in general from “geeks”, and the first conquered users
explained the difficulty to stop after to have try (addiction).
In contrary, so, at
the surgery laparoscopic, the enthusiasm for this tool was immediate without
any study proving its interest for patients and the system of health.
The objective of
this article is to analyze the data of the literature concerning the
usefulness, to date, for patients, the surgeons and the systems of care, of
this sophisticated tool and expensive.
Interest for patients
All first of all, in
analyzing the statistics of insurance sickness (CCAM) between 1993 and 2013, we
are impressed by the evolution of laparoscopy in surgery colorectal in the
convenient surgeons colorectal.
The Practice of Laparoscopy in Surgery
Colorectal disease
has in fact increased in 20 years from 1% (1993) to 50% (2012), progressing
every 10 years from 25 %, that is 2.5 % through year. Thereby, it is close of
90 % (Less than 1% by robotics) and nearly 60% of rectal cancers that are
currently operated on by laparoscopy.
The introduction of
robotic tools thought to allow the development of Minimally Invasive Surgery.
The progression should of the laparoscopy that is superior at 2.5 % per year,
which is far from demonstrates.
Complications
First, one of the
first points to study is the rate of morbidity, and therefore of complications,
which would be lesser what about surgery opened where laparoscopic. That is
false. Party, which have could analyze the statistics from insurance companies
regarding laparoscopic prostatectomies assisted through the robot They
collected 1,460 complications out of 321,361 robot-assisted interventions , if
all complications are included (anaesthetic, infectious, pulmonary, due at from
errors surgical). The authors rectopexies for prolapse of the rectum (whose
conclusions show a similar rate of complications.
Strong Points
• The surgery of laparoscopic colorectal
is now a quarter of century of existence. Since a decade, she considers like
the “Gold Standard" in the processing surgical from colorectal
pathologies.
• The laparoscopy assisted through
robot n / a show at this day any advantage for the patient in the domain of the
surgery colorectal and does not improve in nothing the quality from results
oncology and functional.
• This surgery presents an unjustified
additional cost in view of the published results.
Colon Rectum Robotics
Cost
One of the purposes
of introducing new technologies or new tools is to propose the best care in
controlling the expenses paid through the patients and or the systems of care,
like this was the case with the laparoscopy. The robotic surgery, Also Good
general than colorectal, is marked through an additional cost important of
through intervention, without hold account Cost from robot (of 450 000 at 1,875
million), of the maintenance annual (of 75 000 at 127 500), from additional
cost from to staff additional and from durations operating more long. Strong
fortunately in our system audience, he not there at not, like in some country,
of additional cost billing to patient (of 5 000 at 10 000 for the hospital
and/or the surgeon sometimes paid for by the insurance private).
Of more, any study
does not include the cost of the training from teams (3100 per day of
training). Unlike laparoscopic surgery, the additional costs do not associates
at a fall from cost of hospitalization, nor to a duration of stay more short
and at a recovery more fast from patients. It is With regard to the medical
benefit for patients.
Conclusion
Publications on
laparoscopic colorectal surgery where without robot are very numerous, 95 %
from publications concern the robotics in colorectal surgery, but it only
represents 3% from talks realized in the domain of Minimal Invasive Colorectal Surgery.
The analysis of the literature is so difficult, because she is filled with
items supporters who have for the mostly from time the goal of value the tool
and the team who uses it, and of conclude than it is "feasible" and
sure, with potential benefits. However, we can find from works recent who
honestly evaluate the interest of the tool.
For
more information visit our website: www.gerati.com
Comments
Post a Comment