Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Cost and Complications

 

Lap Trainer Box

Lap Trainer Box

History of Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopy

25 years ago now appeared the surgery colorectal laparoscopy. She was controversial and fought. He had to demonstrates, by of name-pre-uses studies, his interest and his profits for the patients and the system of health before to validates through administrative authorities and learned societies.

Use of Simulation for Laparoscopy Training with Lap Trainer Box is Significant.

When, about ten years ago, an electronic tele-manipulator (which some have called a “robot") was introduced, it immediately aroused the enthusiasm of surgeons. These are in general from “geeks”, and the first conquered users explained the difficulty to stop after to have try (addiction).

In contrary, so, at the surgery laparoscopic, the enthusiasm for this tool was immediate without any study proving its interest for patients and the system of health.

The objective of this article is to analyze the data of the literature concerning the usefulness, to date, for patients, the surgeons and the systems of care, of this sophisticated tool and expensive.

Interest for patients

All first of all, in analyzing the statistics of insurance sickness (CCAM) between 1993 and 2013, we are impressed by the evolution of laparoscopy in surgery colorectal in the convenient surgeons colorectal.

The Practice of Laparoscopy in Surgery

Colorectal disease has in fact increased in 20 years from 1% (1993) to 50% (2012), progressing every 10 years from 25 %, that is 2.5 % through year. Thereby, it is close of 90 % (Less than 1% by robotics) and nearly 60% of rectal cancers that are currently operated on by laparoscopy.

The introduction of robotic tools thought to allow the development of Minimally Invasive Surgery. The progression should of the laparoscopy that is superior at 2.5 % per year, which is far from demonstrates.

Complications

First, one of the first points to study is the rate of morbidity, and therefore of complications, which would be lesser what about surgery opened where laparoscopic. That is false. Party, which have could analyze the statistics from insurance companies regarding laparoscopic prostatectomies assisted through the robot They collected 1,460 complications out of 321,361 robot-assisted interventions , if all complications are included (anaesthetic, infectious, pulmonary, due at from errors surgical). The authors rectopexies for prolapse of the rectum (whose conclusions show a similar rate of complications.

Strong Points

•           The surgery of laparoscopic colorectal is now a quarter of century of existence. Since a decade, she considers like the “Gold Standard" in the processing surgical from colorectal pathologies.

•           The laparoscopy assisted through robot n / a show at this day any advantage for the patient in the domain of the surgery colorectal and does not improve in nothing the quality from results oncology and functional.

•           This surgery presents an unjustified additional cost in view of the published results.

Colon Rectum Robotics

Cost

One of the purposes of introducing new technologies or new tools is to propose the best care in controlling the expenses paid through the patients and or the systems of care, like this was the case with the laparoscopy. The robotic surgery, Also Good general than colorectal, is marked through an additional cost important of through intervention, without hold account Cost from robot (of 450 000 at 1,875 million), of the maintenance annual (of 75 000 at 127 500), from additional cost from to staff additional and from durations operating more long. Strong fortunately in our system audience, he not there at not, like in some country, of additional cost billing to patient (of 5 000 at 10 000 for the hospital and/or the surgeon sometimes paid for by the insurance private).

Of more, any study does not include the cost of the training from teams (3100 per day of training). Unlike laparoscopic surgery, the additional costs do not associates at a fall from cost of hospitalization, nor to a duration of stay more short and at a recovery more fast from patients. It is With regard to the medical benefit for patients.

Conclusion

Publications on laparoscopic colorectal surgery where without robot are very numerous, 95 % from publications concern the robotics in colorectal surgery, but it only represents 3% from talks realized in the domain of Minimal Invasive Colorectal Surgery. The analysis of the literature is so difficult, because she is filled with items supporters who have for the mostly from time the goal of value the tool and the team who uses it, and of conclude than it is "feasible" and sure, with potential benefits. However, we can find from works recent who honestly evaluate the interest of the tool.

For more information visit our website: www.gerati.com

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Endoscopy, Intraoperative and Postoperative Retrospective Analysis

Introduction to Basic Laparoscopic Surgery

Laparoscopic Surgery in Oncology, Rectum and Use of Robotics