Laparoscopic Gastrectomy Lymphadenectomy and Results of Gastric Cancer
Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer
Definition
Locally advanced gastric cancer
invades beyond the submucosa, regardless of lymphatic metastases. Ethicon
Laparoscopic Trainer.
During their internship in laparoscopic
technique, many of them have not received practical training with Ethicon
Laparoscopic Trainer .
This type of cancer requires D2
lymphadenectomy. And unlike lymphadenectomy, it requires dissection of the
lymphatic groups that are around larger vessels. Such as the hepatic artery,
splenic artery, and the portal vein.
In the latest guidelines, the
lymphatic group of the splenic hilum eliminates from the definition of D2 dissection.
Due to the limitations of laparoscopy regarding the visibility of these
lesions, currently, the surgery of choice for patients with locally advanced
gastric cancer is open gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy.
Gaining experience with laparoscopic
gastrectomy in early gastric cancer, surgeons started with the laparoscopic approach
for locally advanced tumors. The presence of more of this staging encouraged
surgeons to perform a greater number of laparoscopic gastrectomy in these
patients, compared.
Results
A multicenter, prospective,
randomized controlled study, called CLASS-01, conducts from 2012 to 2014. 1000
patients with locally advanced gastric cancer randomly assigns to gastrectomy.
laparoscopic vs open, both with D2 lymphatic dissection.
Similar results obtain in
laparoscopic vs. open gastrectomy in perioperative morbidity (15% vs. 13%,
respectively) and perioperative mortality (0.4% vs. 0%, respectively). Also,
both achieved D2 lymphadenectomy rates greater than 99%. At 3 years of the
study, laparoscopic vs open gastrectomy achieved a survival similar,
disease-free survival (77% vs 78% respectively) and similar recurrence rates (19%
vs 17% respectively).
The CLASS-01 study demonstrated that
when performed by experienced surgeons, laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with D2
lymphadenectomy is safe and effective for locally advanced gastric cancer.
However, one-third of the patients were over-staged and had an early
pathological stage.
No patient received neoadjuvant
therapy, contrary to what usually recommends in Western guidelines. Unlike
Western patients, most of these patients require a distal gastrectomy, so it
considers as a limitation. The study, a randomized controlled trial, in which
180 patients compares, the technical safety of laparoscopic gastrectomy with D2
dissection demonstrates in the study.
There is currently a phase III study
to evaluate long-term results as well. A randomized controlled trial that seeks
to compare the effectiveness of laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy with D2
lymphadenectomy for locally advanced cancer.
The studies cited above suggest that
laparoscopic gastrectomy is safe, feasible and onco-logically validated when
performed by experienced surgeons, although long-term data not yet accumulates.
Patient Selection
If you decide to perform a
laparoscopic gastrectomy or an open gastrectomy, you must consider some factors
that will mentions in detail. Laparoscopic
Training simulation with Ethicon
Laparoscopic Trainer is
a prudent choice.
Surgeon Factors
Laparoscopic gastrectomy is a requesting
technique that requires progressed abilities and cooperation. The specialist
should have insight with complex and progressed minimally invasive gastrointestinal
procedure.
This type of laparoscopic surgery is
a complicated procedure, the learning curve associated with mastering
performing the operation D2 lymphadenectomy and reconstruction can be quite
steep.
Studies from Eastern countries
estimated that surgeons would require at least 40 to 60, and possibly more than
90 laparoscopic distal gastrectomy cases, or more than 100 laparoscopic total
gastrectomy cases to become competent. In at least one study, performing fewer
than 45 cases of laparoscopic total gastrectomy was associated with increased morbidity.
Hospital Factors
If a complication occurs, optimal
hospital resources must be available, additional support from critical care
intensivists, therapeutic gastroenterologists, and interventional radiologists
may be necessary. Expert physiotherapy and nutritional support services are
also essential for good results, as many gastric cancer patients come to
surgery in frail or debilitated condition.
Patient Factors
Patient-related factors include body
habitus, comorbidities, and cancer stage. Patients who have early gastric
cancer and those who are free of significant cardiopulmonary comorbidities,
obesity, and previous upper abdominal surgery are the best candidates for laparoscopy.
Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or heart disease may
not tolerate prolonged pneumoperitoneum.
Such patients could benefit from an
open approach. Obesity can make laparoscopic gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy
technically challenging. Studies from Eastern countries found that laparoscopic
gastrectomy in obese patients may require a longer operative time than open
gastrectomy, although lymph node dissection, postoperative recovery and
complication rate were not different.
Previous abdominal surgery can make
laparoscopy technically challenging due to the presence of adhesions or altered
anatomy. However, this factor alone should not prevent the laparoscopic approach.
Stage Of the Neoplasm
Patients with early-stage disease without
local invasion into surrounding structures or bulky lymphadenopathy are optimal
candidates for surgeons to initiate laparoscopic expertise, as are patients
with locally advanced cancer who have responded well to neoadjuvant therapy.
Conclusion
In the most recent rules, the
lymphatic gathering of the splenic hilum dispenses with from the meaning of D2
analyzation. Because of the limits of laparoscopy in regards to the
perceivability of these wounds, as of now, the medical procedure of decision for
patients with privately progressed gastric malignant growth is open gastrectomy
with lymphadenectomy.
For more information visit our website: www.gerati.com
Comments
Post a Comment