Laparoscopic Surgery Classification Cost Indications and Contraindications
During the 1970s and
1980s, developed multiple minimally invasive gynecological procedures, leading
to the development of laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy. In 1985 he
built the pelvi-trainer, as a training equipment for laparoscopic gynecological
procedures. For minimally invasive surgery technique many of them have not
received practical training with simulators resembling Ethicon Laparoscopic Trainer.
The first
laparoscopic hysterectomy was performed in 1993. The first laparoscopic
hysterectomy was performed in 2001, at Hospital. Regarding robot-assisted
laparoscopic hysterectomy, it was first performed experimentally in animals.
The first publication in humans was in 2002 and current evidence demonstrates
the safety and effectiveness of robotics in gynecological surgery.
Concepts and Classification
- Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy:
These are patients
in whom some procedure is performed laparoscopically, for example: lysis of
adhesions, oophorectomy or salpingo-oophorectomy, then conventional vaginal
hysterectomy is performed.
- Laparoscopic hysterectomy:
Involves
laparoscopic ligation of the uterine vessels. After ligation, the rest of the
surgery can continue laparoscopically or vaginally.
- Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy:
As its name implies,
it involves leaving the cervical stump partially or completely. This technique
leaves the cervix intact, preserving the uterosacral and cardinal ligaments.
Some authors consider that sexual functionality is better protected by
safeguarding the cervix and vagina. The uterus is removed by morcellation from
above or below.
Much confusion has
arisen due to the multitude of technical variants that this surgical procedure
has presented and due to the terminology used. Therefore, classifications have
been proposed to assess the technique used and the extent of the laparoscopic
procedure.
One of Them Is the Clermont Ferrand Classification That Is Set Out Below:
Type I:
Includes hemostasis
and sectioning of the adnexal pedicles and round ligaments, which frees the
cusp of the broad ligament and facilitates the rest of the maneuvers vaginally.
Type II:
Associated with
uterine-vesical detachment and hemostasis of the uterine pedicles.
Type III:
Performs the
dissection of the cervix intrafascially, the hemostasis of the cervicovaginal
pedicles and begins the vaginal opening.
Type IV:
Consists of
performing the entire hysterectomy laparoscopically, including vaginal opening
and closure. The only moment of vaginal use is the extraction of the piece.
Cost with Laparoscopic Techniques
Controversies begin
to arise when analyzing the benefits in terms of cost. In general, studies to
date show a higher cost with laparoscopic techniques. The economic implications
depend on local factors and the type of technique adopted. The use of
disposable instruments greatly influences costs. Laparoscopic hysterectomy can
be performed at the same or lower cost than conventional surgery, as long as
techniques with reusable equipment are used.
The abdominal route
is the traditional method of performing hysterectomy plus bilateral salping
oophorectomy, and in this sense, adnexectomy has been considered another
advantage of laparoscopic hysterectomy. The operative time has been considered
a weak point of laparoscopic hysterectomy. The Clermont Ferrand series reached
an average duration of 97.4 +/- 37.9 minutes. Other authors do not report
significant differences between the abdominal and laparoscopic routes.
Indications and
Contraindications of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
Indications
When there is a
benign disease in which an abdominal approach is usually required and when
vaginal hysterectomy is contraindicated, as in the case of a narrow pubic arch,
narrow vagina without prolapse or arthritis that prevents the patient from
being placed in the lithotomy position, to sufficiently expose the vagina.
In relation to the
size and weight of the uterus, many authors consider that uteri of more than
700 grams should not be approached laparoscopically, although the range of
acceptance of different series ranges from those that place the limit between
200-500 g to those who accept estimated weights of 1000 g or more, and those
who recommend the use of different methods to reduce the size of the organ and
then proceed to surgery.
In the case of large
fibroids, the indication for laparoscopic hysterectomy depends on many factors:
the shape and diameter of the uterus, its mobility in the pelvis, the location
of the fibroids, the width of the patient's pelvis, height and surgical field,
the instruments available and the experience of the surgical team.
Contraindications
Uterine dimensions
and weight greater than those described above, patients with stage IV
endometriosis with extensive involvement of the cul-de-sac of Douglas, unless
the surgeon has the ability and time to resect all fibrotic endometriosis from
the vagina, ligaments uterosacros and rectus anterior.
For more information visit our website: www.gerati.com
Comments
Post a Comment