Laparoscopy and Laparotomy of Complications Acute Intestinal Obstruction (AIO) Treatment
Laparoscopy Management of Complications
Most surgeons
believe that laparoscopy is effective and safe in the management of
complications after laparoscopic and endoscopic procedures, although it is not
easy to perform. Laparoscopic access, while maintaining the integrity of the
abdominal wall, allows you to directly visualize the abdominal cavity, quickly
identify the complication and choose the necessary tactics.
The use of Laparoscopic Trainer is a prudent choice for Training.
Moreover,
laparoscopy reduces the number of complications after reoperation, mortality,
length of hospital stay, improves quality of life, reduces pain and ensures a
quick return of the patient to normal activities.
Peritonitis Study
78 cases of
peritonitis were observed, which the authors treated laparoscopically. In 42
cases, anastomotic leakage observes after colorectal surgery (26 - anterior
resection of the rectum, 9 - left-sided hemicolectomy, 7 - right-sided, the overall
rate of anastomotic leakage was 3.2%). Reoperation consisted of abdominal
lavage, placement of one or more drains, ileostomy (38 cases, 90.5%) or
Hartmann's operation (4 cases, 9.5%).
24 patients had
colon perforation: 2 after laparoscopic left-sided nephrectomy, 18 after
colonoscopy and 4 due to intestinal ischemia after left-sided hemicolectomy.
With ischemic perforation, the Hartman operation performs. Endoscopic
perforation was eliminated by direct suturing on a well-prepared intestine - in
early operations and minor injuries (n=9); in other cases, sutures were
supplemented with ileostomy (n=8). One case of perforation during endoscopic
polypectomy ended with resection with primary anastomosis.
Colon perforation
after nephrectomy treats with following:
·
Abdominal
lavage,
·
Exteriorization
of the damaged intestine, and
·
Temporary
colostomy,
·
Followed
by its closure after 2 months
Clinical Manifestations
The authors observed
2 cases of small bowel perforation after left-sided hemicolectomy due to
incorrect traction with a clamp that went beyond the field of view. Clinical
manifestations are peritonitis on the second day after surgery. It is Conducted
suturing interrupted sutures, washing and drainage of the abdominal cavity.
Observed 1 case of
jejunal perforation after laparoscopic suturing of a large ventral hernia in
the right upper quadrant of the abdomen in a complete patient. Perforation detects
on the second day after the receipt of intestinal contents through the Redon
drainage. It was probably a delayed perforation due to thermal damage to the
visceral peritoneum of the intestine after the restoration of peristalsis. The
abdominal cavity washes, the defect sutures, the mesh abundantly wash
(ultralight, macroporous) and drainage left. The postoperative course was
favorable with discharge on the 6th day. Neither mesh infection nor recurrence observes
for 2 years.
Operates Laparoscopically and Laparotomy
The authors operated
on 7 cases of biliary peritonitis after LCE. Two bile leaks from the accessory
duct of the gallbladder bed, the duct sutures with 4-0 sutures, and the space drains.
In 4 cases, the source of bile leakage was not found: in 3 cases, the abdominal
cavity was washed and papillosphincterotomy (PST) was performed. In 1 patient,
an accessory duct of the IV segment of the liver was found. He underwent PST
with the installation of a biliary stent.
In 11 patients,
duodenal perforation observes after endoscopic PST. Only the first patient treats
laparoscopically. The course was unfavorable and the patient died of sepsis on
the 16th day. The second case operates laparoscopically, but switches to
laparotomy due to technical difficulties. These episodes convinced the authors
that these complications should operates on by laparotomy due to the need for
extensive mobilization of the duodenum. In 4 cases, perforation was detected
after the introduction of bluing through the probe, followed by suturing,
omentopexy, cholecystectomy and installation of a T-shaped drainage. In the
remaining 6 cases, the perforation was not found, limited to drainage of the
abdominal cavity.
Postoperative Acute Intestinal Obstruction (AIO)
Of the 25 cases, all
patients cure laparoscopically, except for one. The most common cause of Acute
intestinal obstruction (AIO) is early postoperative adhesive obstruction in 14
cases: in 2 patients, adhesions occurred between the mesh and the intestine
after ventral hernia repair; 2 - resection of the small intestine, 1 - ventral
hernioplasty). 13 patients underwent laparoscopic adhesiolysis. In 1 case,
bowel resection was required due to ischemia.
The procedure successfully
completes in 158 (98.7%) patients. The postoperative bed-day was longer with
generalized peritonitis than and bleeding. The total number of complications
after reoperation was 7.5% (12/160). Adverse events included 4 cases of sub-diaphragmatic
abscess treated with CT-guided percutaneous puncture, 4 cases of pulmonary
insufficiency due to bronchopneumonia with effusion pleurisy treated with
medication, 2 cases of pulmonary embolism treated conservatively, 2 cases of
heart failure also treated with medication.
Mortality was 1.87%.
3 patients died: 1 from myocardial infarction on the 15th day after the
operation, 1 from pulmonary embolism on the 10th day after the operation, and
the third from sepsis on the 18th day.
Endo-Surgery Treatment
In urgent surgery,
DL becomes the method of choice when minimally invasive diagnostic methods are
ineffective or give an uncertain result, since laparoscopy provides direct and
optimal visualization of the abdominal organs. In many cases, endo-surgery
allows for radical treatment with minimal trauma, avoiding abdominal surgery.
In a series of 55
patients with acute abdomens, demonstrate the diagnostic value of laparoscopy
is equal to that of laparotomy. Reported laparoscopy provides a correct
diagnosis in 98.6% of patients with acute abdomen. Many authors report a
diagnostic benefit of laparoscopy of 89–100%. In 80% of cases, acute abdomens
can treats laparoscopically. Abdominal emergencies are often a challenge for
the surgeon, since many diseases can have a similar clinical picture, and accurate
diagnosis and adequate treatment become key. In the case of peritonitis,
laparoscopy provides a complete examination of the abdominal cavity with good
sanitation of the abdominal cavities.
Peritonitis Contraindication
However, today some
authors consider peritonitis a contraindication to laparoscopy, since it
increases the risk of bacteremia and endotoxemia, which can causes by PN. Although
other experts believe that laparoscopy is safe and effective in this situation.
Conclusion
Laparoscopy is
constantly evolving and becoming the gold standard in the treatment of many
human diseases. Thanks to the improvement of technology, the growth of the
skill of surgeons and the spread of highly specialized centers, laparoscopy is
gaining importance not only in elective, but also in emergency surgery.
For more information visit our website: www.gerati.com
Comments
Post a Comment