Laparoscopy and Robotic Surgery Ergonomics Surgical Robots and Cost
Laparoscopy and Robotic Surgery
Robotic surgery is a
useful and forward-looking procedure in modern medicine, but it is technically
and organizationally complex and expensive. The medical technology startup,
wants to merge robotic surgery with classic laparoscopic interventions and bring
both worlds together in the best possible way: "Surgery" is the name
of the surgical robot, which on the one hand will give the surgeon a great deal
of flexibility and ergonomics and on the other hand is particularly lean and
cost-efficient.
During their
internship in laparoscopic technique, many of them have not received practical
training with simulators Laparoscopic Trainer.
The Surgeon Has To Be Experienced
Surgery designs to
provide the surgeon with the best possible support without changing the
surgical workflow. Different facets play a role in this. On the one hand, there
are purely spatial dimensions: Surgery has two robotic arms and not three or
four, as in conventional systems. This means that the laparoscopic setup
remains on the patient with sufficient space for the surgeon and assistants.
The robotic arms can simply move aside and returned to use in a matter of
seconds, if needed, to switch between laparoscopic and robotic instrumentation.
Thus, the advantages
of robotic surgery in laparoscopy become accessible and both techniques merge.
The robot offers the main advantages of robotic surgery: it works precisely,
offers distally angling instruments and an ergonomic position for the surgeon
during the procedure. During the course of the operation, the surgeon can
decide at any time whether he wants to use the robot or carry out work steps
conventionally laparoscopically. The name "Surgery" derives from the
English term "Surgery", which means skill. According to the
developers of the robot, this is optimize by the instruments that bend distally
and move in seven degrees of freedom.
Surgery Brings the Operator
Surgery designs to
keep the surgeon in sterile contact with the patient throughout the entire
operation. The structure of the operation and the position of the trocars
hardly differ from a conventional laparoscopy. The position of the robotic arms
can change at any time during the operation, making it quick and easy to change
the trocar, for example – a process that can be very time-consuming with
conventional robotic systems. This provides a great deal of flexibility and
combines the classic laparoscopy setting with robotic surgery.
The setup for
robot-assisted surgery is usually different from laparoscopy. With the use of
the robot, the surgeon ties to the operating console and far away, from what is
actually happening at the table and the patient. However, complications can also
occur with robot-assisted surgeries, according to an analysis of 14 years of
data collected by the FDA. 1Whether the robot itself causes a problem or
whether there is a general, operational risk plays a subordinate role. It is
important and safer for the patient if the surgeon can intervene in what is
happening within a few seconds. Switching from working with Surgery to acting
directly on the patient is possible in less than 20 seconds.
Improved Ergonomics
Often time-consuming
work steps in laparoscopic interventions carries out with the help of the robot
in an ergonomic posture, such as the representation of structures or the
mobilization of organs as well as the final suturing, especially in narrow and
difficult-to-access areas. The Surgery console is height adjustable, allowing
the surgeon to work while seated or standing. Even longer work steps are
possible on the ergonomically designed console in a relaxed position - the
change between the two techniques takes place within seconds. Various investigations
and studies have established the importance of ergonomics.
The Central Journal
for Surgery writes about laparoscopy: “The advantages for the patient are well
known: better cosmetic results, less postoperative pain and a shorter hospital
stay. For the surgeon, on the other hand, this surgical technique has
disadvantages. These are an unfavorable posture that does not accepts by
employees and company doctors in other work areas.
Open Platform
Laparoscopy
deliberately developed a modular concept with Surgery. The robot complements
the surgeon's arms - all other instruments remain as before. The clinics and
doctors consciously select technologies that promise the best possible clinical
results. Notwithstanding, new innovations specifically need time before they
are accessible in automated frameworks on the grounds that careful robots have
up until this point been shut stages,. This applies to innovative imaging
processes as well as to modern ultrasound and electrosurgical instruments. In
combination with Surgery, the hospitals can use the best possible instruments
and easily exchange them if necessary.
The Use of Surgical Robots and Cost
Currently, the costs
for robot-assisted surgeries are high. Although the clinics buy the systems,
they often pay for every operation performed by “colleague robots”. The costs
relate not only to the acquisition and maintenance costs for the expensive
systems, but also to possible longer operating times 3because of the sometimes
complex and inflexible systems. The startup has been working for a long time to
optimize the surgical robot Surgery in such a way that the costs are within a
range that easily covers by the reimbursement for a laparoscopic procedure by
the clinic. In doing so, quality not sacrifice - Surgery's planning and
production carries out entirely at a high-tech level - but unnecessary
complexity: In Surgery a number of patents ideas to create the system simpler
and less costly.
A well thought-out
mechanical design makes Surgery functionally reliable and at the same time
cheaper to manufacture. Surgery is set up and ready to use in minutes. Robot
arms and operating console are sterile covered, the robotic arms positioned
according to the trocars and the instruments inserted and registered.
Conclusion
In this way, the
investment budget not additionally burdens and the hurdle for the use of
robot-assisted surgery drops significantly. In a pay-per-use model, the clinics
can agree a framework agreement with us for rent, consumables and service. The
modular system allows clinics to continue using existing instruments and
imaging technologies,” explains. We depend on a rental model so that we can
make rental model so that we can make Surgery available to as many clinics and
hospitals as possible at low cost.
For
more information visit our website: www.gerati.com
Comments
Post a Comment